Liberal MP Wendy Lovell under fire for postcode snobbery
Table of Contents
Toggle [ad_1]
A Liberal MP has been slammed for controversial remarks about deprived kids mixing with abundant youngsters.
A Victorian Liberal MP has been slammed for arguing kids from deprived residences need to not mix with other people in Melbourne’s wealthiest suburbs.
Wendy Lovell made the reviews even though Victoria’s upper dwelling debated a Greens invoice aimed at reducing homelessness.
Ms Lovell claimed public housing should not be created in Melbourne’s elite areas, where by folks from lower-money households would likely not be recognized.
“We want to make confident we set these properties in spots where by family members are recognized and where people can prosper,” she advised parliament.
“There is no level in placing a quite low income, possibly welfare-dependent relatives in the greatest avenue in Brighton exactly where the small children simply cannot blend with some others or go to the university with other kids or the place they do not have the identical ability to have the latest in sneakers and iPhones.
“We have received to make confident that folks can truly match into a neighbourhood, that they have a fantastic existence and that men and women are not stigmatising them for the reason that of their conditions.”
Ms Lovell, who is based mostly in Shepparton, is a former housing minister.
The uncomfortable reviews sparked outrage on social media and ended up condemned by a handful of Labor MPs.
Victorian Opposition Leader Matthew Man advised reporters he believed Ms Lovell meant effectively.
“They are exceptionally clumsy (feedback),” he mentioned.
“I do feel as a former housing minister she is surely trying to locate the finest intention but it has not been put that way.”
Various Labor and crossbench MPs demanded an apology above the comments which had been labelled disgraceful and “typical Liberal postcode snobbery”.
The assertion drew a strong reaction from Labor MP Mark Gepp, who criticised Ms Lovell.
“Those persons are distinct, of course, they are distinctive. They do not wear the correct shoes,” he stated.
“Well, bollocks to that, your placement on the socio-economic ladder need to by no means establish your participation in this society underneath any situations.
“Shame on you for suggesting that it need to.”
[ad_2]
Supply backlink
You may also like
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- October 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- November 2018
- October 2018
- January 2017
Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
